Hier präsentieren wir eine Auswahl von Publikationen der Lehrstuhlmitarbeiter. Sie lassen sich den folgenden Forschungsbereichen zuordnen:
Betsch, T., & Roth, P. (2018). Intuitive thinking. In L.J. Ball & V.A. Thompson (eds.), Routledge international handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 37- 56). New York: Taylor & Francis – Routledge. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315725697-3
Söllner, A., Bröder, A., Glöckner, A. & Betsch, T. (2014). Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: Evidence from an information intrusion paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 146, 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007
Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2012). Decisions beyond boundaries: When more information is processed faster than less. Acta Psychologica, 139,532-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.01.009
Betsch, T., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.517737
Glöckner , A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
Glöckner , A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Modelling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228. https://journal.sjdm.org/bn3.pdf
Betsch, T. & Kraus, M. (1999). Die Auswirkungen von Ergebnis-Framing und dem Wechsel der Problemdomäne auf monetäre Entscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 46, 296-304. https://doi.org/10.1026//0949-3964.46.4.296
Bless, H., Betsch, T., & Franzen, A. (1998). Framing the framing effect: The impact of context cues on solutions to the “Asian Disease” problem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 287-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<287::AID-EJSP861>3.0.CO;2-U
Plessner, H. Betsch, C., & Betsch, T. (2008) (Eds.). Intuition in judgment and decision making. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Betsch, T., Lindow, S., Lehmann, A., & Stenmans, R. (2021). From perception to inference: utilization of probabilities as decision weights in children. Memory and Cognition, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01127-0
Lang, A. (2021). Teaching children to take the best. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 72, 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101234
Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Jekel, M., Lindow, S., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 514–528. https://journal.sjdm.org/18/18225/jdm18225.pdf
Lindow, S., & Betsch, T. (2018). Child decision-making: On the burden of pre-decisional information search. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19, 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1436057
Betsch, T., Wünsche, K., Großkopf, A., Schröder, K., & Stenmans, R. (2017). Sonification and visualization of pre-decisional information search: Identifying toolboxes in children. Developmental Psychology, accepted for publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000447
Lindow, S., Lang, A., & Betsch, T. (2017). Holistic information integration in child decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 1131-1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2029
Betsch, T., Lehmann, A., Lindow, S., Lang, A., & Schoemann, M. (2016). Lost in Search: (Mal-) Adaptation to probabilistic decision environments in children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 52, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000077
Betsch, T., Lang, A., Lehmann, A., & Axmann, J.M. (2014). Utilizing probabilities as decision weights in closed and open information boards: A comparison of children and adults. Acta Psychologica, 153, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.008
Betsch, T., & Lang, A. (2013). Utilization of probabilistic cues in the presence of irrelevant information: A comparison of risky choice in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.003
Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005) (Eds.). The routines of decision making. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
Betsch, T., Lindow, S., Engel, C., Ulshöfer, C., & Kleber, J. (2015) Has the world changed? My neighbor might know - Effects of social context on routine deviation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1828
Bröder, A., Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., Link, D., & Ettlin, F. (2013). Do people learn option or strategy routines in multi-attribute decisions? The answer depends on subtle factors. Acta Psychologica, 143, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.03.005
Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Höhle, C. (2002). Explaining and predicting routinized decision making: A review of theories. Theory and Psychology, 12, 453-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012004294
Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on information acquisition and adaptation in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2916
Betsch, T., Fiedler, K., & Brinkmann, J. (1998). Behavioral routines in decision making: The effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 861-878 . https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(1998110)28:6<861::AID-EJSP899>3.0.CO;2-D
Betsch, T. (2011) The stability of preferences – A social cognition view. Frontiers in Psychology (Cognition), 2, 290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00290
Betsch, T., Kaufmann, M., Lindow, F., Plessner, H., Hoffmann, K. (2006). Different principles of information aggregation in implicit and explicit attitude formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 887-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.328
Betsch, T., Hoffmann, K., Hoffrage, U., & Plessner, H. (2003). Intuition beyond recognition: When less familiar events are liked more. Experimental Psychology, 50, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1026/1618-3169.50.1.49
Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I like it but I don‘t know why: A value-account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272009
Sedlmeier, P., & Betsch, T. (2002) (Eds.). Etc. - Frequency processing and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lang, A., & Betsch, T. (2018). Neglect of probabilities in decision making with and without feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00191
Haase, N., Renkewitz, F., & Betsch, C. (2013). The measurement of subjective probability: Evaluating the sensitivity and accuracy of various scales. Risk Analysis, 33(10), 1812–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12025
Winkler, I., Glauer, M., Betsch, T., & Sedlmeier, P. (2015). The impact of attention on judgments of frequency and duration. PLoS One, 10, e0126974. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126974
Betsch, T., Glauer, M., Renkewitz, F., Winkler, I., & Sedlmeier, P. (2010). Encoding, storage and judgment of frequency and duration. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 347-364. https://journal.sjdm.org/10/91221b/jdm91221b.pdf
Fiedler, K., Brinkmann, J., Betsch, T., & Wild, B. (2000). A sampling approach to conditional probability judgment: Beyond base-rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.399
Betsch, T., Siebler, F., Marz, P., Hormuth, S., & Dickenberger, D. (1999). The moderating role of category salience and category focus in judgments of set size and frequency of occurrence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004006
Betsch, T., & Fiedler, K. (1999). Understanding conjunction effects: The role of implicit mental models. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199902)29:1<75::AID-EJSP916>3.0.CO;2-F
Betsch, T., Jäckel, P., Hammes, M. & Brinkmann, B.J. (2021). On the adaptive value of paranormal beliefs - A qualitative study. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09594-5
Betsch, T., Aßmann, L., & Glöckner, A. (2020). Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: Story seeking without reasoned review. Heliyon, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04259
Haase, N., Schmid, P., & Betsch, C. (2020). Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions. Psychology & Health, 35(3), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1630561
Betsch, T., Chalupny, J., Grünewald, S., Hofert, L., & Männer, L.-S. (2018). Das Geschäft mit den Globuli - Wird in deutschen Apotheken evidenzbasiert beraten? Skeptiker, 1, 9-13.
Haase, N., Betsch, C., & Renkewitz, F. (2015). Source credibility and the biasing effect of narrative information on the perception of vaccination risks. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 20(8), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018605
Haase, N., & Betsch, C. (2012). Parents trust other parents: Lay vaccination narratives on the web may create doubt about vaccination safety. Medical Decision Making, 32(4), 645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x12445286
Betsch, C., Renkewitz, F., Ulshöfer, C., & Betsch, T. (2011). The influence of narrative vs. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Medical Decision Making, 31, 742-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X11400419
Betsch, C., Renkewitz, F., Betsch, T., & Ulshöfer, C. (2010). The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309353647
Renkewitz, F. & Keiner, M. (in press). How to detect publication bias in psychological research? A comparative evaluation of six statistical methods. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. (Preprint: https://psyarxiv.com/w94ep/)
Sedlmeier, P. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. (3. aktualisierte und erweiterte Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium.
Glöckner, A., Fiedler, S. & Renkewitz, F. (2018). Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft: Strategische Ausrichtung von Forschungsprozessen als Weg aus der Replikationskrise. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 22 -36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000384
Open Science Collaboration … , Renkewitz, F, … et al. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Renkewitz, F. & Jahn, G. (2012). Memory Indexing: A novel method for tracing memory processes in complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38(6), 1622-1639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028073
Renkewitz, F, Fuchs, H. M. & Fiedler, S. (2011). Is there evidence for publication biases in JDM research? Judgment and Decision Making,6(8), 870-881. https://journal.sjdm.org/11/m27/m27.pdf
Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.688
Universität Erfurt (Campus)
Nordhäuser Str. 63
99089 Erfurt
